Psych Crime Reporter engages in the unenviable task of finding and presenting news items about mental health practitioners who have been prosecuted and/or found guilty of a crime or who have had their licenses suspended, revoked or otherwise disciplined for misconduct including drug/prescribing violations, sex with patients, etc.
I could do this 12 hours a day, if I had 12 hours a day to devote to it.
There seems to always be plenty of this kind of news about psychiatrists, psychologists, clinical social workers, mental health counselors and the like. This area of the health care industry just seems to be the most criminal, the most immoral and unethical.
If you have a story or a tip or suggestion, please leave it in the “Comments” section.
Please tell me where you get your information.
I have wasted 3/4 of an hour on the phone with Medical Board of California today trying to find out why Michael J. Menaster MD & psychiatrist appears repeatedly up and down the active page on google as a practicing psychiatrist.
According to your article(http://psychcrimereporter.wordpress.com/2009/10/08/california-psychiatrist-michael-j-menaster-placed-on-probation-for-long-history-of-emotional-and-behavioral-problems/) Re Menaster “On September 21, 2009 the California Medical Board revoked psychiatrist Michael J. Menaster’s license.” Etc.
I am concerned because I was a student at Golden Gate University, grad 2008, where this man taught and he is a very frightening, paranoid individual. Some of us complained & I heard that he was fired in 2008 from his teaching position.
Much later I saw your October 2009 article informing that Menaster had his license lifted, etc.
The Medical Board of CA insists they do not have information matching yours AND that Menaster completed his probation several years back & his license has been returned to him to practice medicine in CA & SF.
Can you please explain this discrepancy? This man Menaster, if it is the same Michael J. Menaster, is an extraordinarily paranoid, delusional, hysterical individual with poor impulse control and frightening temper problems.
I would deeply appreciate any feedback you can give me about the inconsistency in information about this case. He should be heavily medicated & under constant supervision — not working alone with patients nor should he be left alone to teach classes of young Asian women — about whom he has an obsession.
I am & was much, much older than the other psychology students at Golden Gate University & I knew something was terribly wrong with this “teacher” but the chair blew me off & refused to acknowledge my complaints and observations.
Imagine how disturbed I am to read your article of recent charges against him & then to see presenting himself as a psychiatrist & MD on google.
Thank you,
Kathy
Comment by Kathy — June 8, 2010 @ 6:40 pm |
Dear Kathy,
The story that is on Psych Crime Reporter states that the Medical Board revoked his license, however “revocation was stayed and he was placed on three years probation.” Please revisit the entry on Menaster on this blog. It is in the first two lines. I don’ t know why the Board even mentions that it “revoked” one’s license if it then stayed the revocation. It’s symbolic, I suppose (but confusing too).
In September, the Board issued an Order which confirmed the April 2009 decision of the Administrative Law Judge, which is the stayed revocation and three years probation.
However, neither the April decision or the September Order are posted on the Board’s website, which is curious.
I would recommend that if you have knowledge of Menaster’s misconduct, you write a letter of complaint to the Board. The more they have on file against misbehaving/dangerous psychiatrists, the better.
I hope this helps clarify your confusion on the matter.
Sincerely,
PsychCrimeReporter
Comment by Psych Crime Reporter — June 8, 2010 @ 7:24 pm |
“You think mental healthcare is “the most unethical, criminal or immoral? Your idea of investigative journalism is not very thorough.
And regarding Menaster — what should the woman complain to the board about? Is she a patient or a student? There is a big difference. If the man’s license was revoked and stayed, there was a reason.
You need to get your facts straight about directing individuals to write the medical board for reasons which seem to be based on impression rather than fact.
I suspect this site is financed by the Church of Scientology. It makes too much of an effort to downgrade mental health without balancing facts about treatment. It certainly doesn’t have into account the thousands of pages of testimony that are not in the public domain about these cases.
It sounds the the writer Kathy, is the one who is paranoid.
Comment by Angela — July 25, 2010 @ 9:51 am |
This is a blog on WordPress, hence is not financed by anyone—it’s free.
Not everyone who speaks out about crimes and abuse in the mental health industry is related to Scientology. You are trying to divert people off the issue, which is that there is crime and fraud and abuse in the mental health “profession.”
Here are the facts about mental health: 1) the manufacturers of the drugs don’t, for the most part, know how the drugs work. The entries in the Physicians Desk Reference for antidepressants and antipsychotics show that the makers haven’t identified the “therapeutic mechanism.” 2) Psychiatrists, psychologists, etc. don’t know what causes mental and emotional problems.
So, they psychiatrists don’t know the cause and the drug makers don’t know how the drugs work. There’s your facts, Angela.
Comment by Psych Crime Reporter — July 26, 2010 @ 4:21 pm |
A number of your posts are cited from The Citizens Commission on Human Rights which is an advocacy group established in 1969 by the Church of Scientology and psychiatrist Thomas Szasz. The group promotes several video campaigns and we believe this site, which support views against psychiatry. The organization holds that mental illness is not a medical disease, and that the use of psychiatric medication is a destructive and fraudulent practice. The CCHR continues to be entirely controlled by and subject to policy directives issued from the Church of Scientology.
Your posts do not put all the facts into perspectives about the nature of the cases cited.
We will be setting up a site to counter your site within the next couple of months. Then we can see what investigative journalism is really all about.
We cannot wait. And we don’t care whether you post this on your site or not.
Comment by andrew.smith@hotmail.com — September 14, 2010 @ 1:04 am |
The source of our (and CCHR’s) content is news stories and state health care licensing board disciplinary actions against mental health practitioners–not anyone’s opinion.
Comment by Psych Crime Reporter — September 14, 2010 @ 1:32 am |
Your site tends to identify cases or accusations but not the end results of these cases — hence many are dropped or stayed. But why should you do that? You serve to denigrate all psychiatrists and while some, like in any profession have committed minor infractions, you fail to put these into perspective regarding the more egregious ones. It is clear your site serves one purpose and one purpose only and that is to instill hate and bias and ruin the lives of many people. Again, I am not saying that there aren’t serious infractions, but perhaps you should put into perspective how Medical Boards really operate, and why they like plea bargains and putting people on probation — and taking all these courses that are offered by individuals that have less experience than the ones they teach.
Comment by Lawrence Mark — March 10, 2011 @ 3:39 pm
Well Lawrence,
Since you seem to know so much about how licensing boards work, you ought to know that, by and large, they work…slowly. You should also know that once they file an accusation or statement of charges against a licensee, it eventually goes to a final action such as and Order, Stipulated Settlement, etc. I have yet to see a board “drop or stay” a charge once it has been filed. They revoke licenses and the stay the revocation (Medical Board of California seems to favor this) but they don’t withdraw charges.
Secondly, a review of the first three pages of the blog finds there are 27 cases reported on.
Of these, 16 are final actions. That’s nearly two-thirds. That hardly qualifies for “tending” to report only on charges or initial actions.
Lastly, Psych Crime Reporter for the most part merely regurgitates existing news state disciplinary actions and engages in little, if any, editorializing and no “hate mongering.”
The facts of the cases speak for themselves and hatemongering is for people who don’t have a legitimate argument.
Comment by Psych Crime Reporter — March 10, 2011 @ 7:35 pm
I know for a fact that this website is linked to the Church of scientology. A letter from the The Citizens Commission on Human Rights which is an advocacy group established in 1969 by the Church of Scientology and psychiatrist Thomas Szasz, went to a friend’s employer about a ruling against her. The wording on this webiste is the exact same as that letter. This posting is dated 7 days after that letter. The letter that went to the employer was completely out of context and purely for destructive purposes. As a result, my friend lost her job even though she was not longer working in the mental health field. Yes therapists need to do ethical work but at the same time we do not know all of the circumstances. Should someone’s life be ruined for a mistake(s) they made? And I am not talking about shooting someone or having sex with a client which is the focus of so many of your articles. The Church of scientology is AGAINST mental health treatment. So clearly you seek out people to further add to the issue and target them. That is sick!
Comment by Timothy — September 19, 2010 @ 8:13 pm |
Oh, you know for a fact, do you? Well, take a look at http://www.psychcrime.org/news/index.php?vd=892&t=New+Hampshire+board+suspends+psychologist+Christine+E.+Frydenborg+(aka+Dargon)+for+three+years and you will see that the story was posted on a CCHR website the day before Psych Crime Reporter’s posting. We use liberally from that website and usually credit them as the source (they usually have a lot of stuff you don’t see anywhere else). As for your friend, well…she was apparently required, if working in a position which required a psychologist, to make her employer aware of the disciplinary action against her.
Comment by Psych Crime Reporter — September 20, 2010 @ 4:19 pm |
Thanks for writing this blog! Getting info out there on this unethical mental health practitioners is so important. Too meny of these so called “professionals” are capable of doing a great deal of harm again and again due to a lack of enforcement by regualtory agencies and boards…it’s good to see some action here!
I’ll be adding you to my blogroll You can read my blog at http://wisdomovertime.wordpress.com/
Comment by wisdomovertime — November 25, 2010 @ 2:22 pm |
Dear Wisdomovertime,
Glad to be of service.
Psych Crime Reporter
Comment by Psych Crime Reporter — November 26, 2010 @ 9:42 pm |
What does it matter if this web site is associated to Scientology [Psych Crime Reporter: Or not?]! It is exposing atrocities that would otherwise not be reported by the syndicated press which are only comparable to the Nazi Nuremburg trials. The psychiatric industry is structured behind a veil of secrecy and legal privacy statutes that allow it immunity from investigation far greater than attorney-client-privilege, HIPPA privacy laws, or national security secrecy laws.
The practice of psychopharmacological psychiatry using neurotoxic substances below their known toxic threshold is a very dangerous and patients are easily susceptible to neurological iatrogenic injuries. The structure of secrecy between the doctor-patient-privilege allows these psychiatrists to easily hide neurological iatrogenic injuries from being exposed to proper authorities. A psychiatrist has the power to deem his patient who obtained neurological iatrogenic injuries as mentally incompetent to stand trial against him. The psychiatrist has the ability to prescribe an alternate medication to incapacitate a patient with neuroligical iatrogenic injures in an effort to prevent medical malpractice lawsuit. Isn’t this an abuse of power that should be closely monitored? Our legal system has no regulations to monitor this abuse of power nor does the syndicated media and it seems to be suspiciously heavily supported.
A psychiatrist has close ties to police departments in efforts to profile criminals, evaluate suspects mental capacities, interrogate suspects, treat officers exposed trauma while on duty, treat officers exposed to corruption while on duty, and so forth. A psychiatrist has close ties to prosecuting attorneys who use every resource possible to convict criminals who are likely injured by either the neurotoxic effects of illicit or psychopharmaceutical drugs. A psychiatrist has close ties with judges who try civil and criminal cases of defendants with iatrogenic neurological injuries by requesting subjective expert witness opinions of their mental capacity. Judges are also closely tied to psychiatrists by seeking treatment for the toxic emotions created by being torn by the difficult decisions they are compelled to perform daily. In other words, psychiatrists have a Ph.D. in utilizing the words of suggestion to influence the outcome of legal proceedings, legal precedents, and the new laws that we are all obligated to abide by. Their integrity is never questioned.
A psychiatrist has close ties with physical practicing doctors by treating the guilt and remorse caused by iatrogenic injuries that they inflicted on patients. A psychiatrist has close ties with psychopharmaceutical companies who peddle their neurotoxic medications to unsuspecting psychiatrists. All while the FDA closes their eyes to the millions of individuals inflicted by iatrogenic neurological injuries caused by these medications. Many patients are left without the mental capacity to recognize that they have been injured in the first place.
A psychiatrist performs experimentation on the susceptible individuals who are already over exposed to environmental toxins, toxic personal relations, or toxic personal events that drive an individual to seek assistance to overcome these toxins. A psychiatrist only adds more neurotoxins to mask the symptoms of original toxins. There is no effort to find and eradicate the source of the original toxic exposure, but only to treat the symptoms.
This is why I support CCHR 100% in their effort to seek out and expose the criminal aspects of psychiatry. I is not a Scientology thing, it’s a moral integrity thing. It is a criminal and social problem that needs corrected now for the safety of all future generations to come.
Comment by Roy — January 6, 2011 @ 12:03 pm |
Some people will attempt to distract others from this actual, vital and urgent issue (“the moral integrity thing,” as you state) by screaming “Scientology!” Thanks for making it clear that religion has nothing to do with it. The exposure of the truth about psychiatry and the pharma industry is being carried out by plenty of people–Scientologists and non-Scientologists alike.
Comment by Psych Crime Reporter — January 6, 2011 @ 5:08 pm |
Hear hear Psych Crime Reporter!!! In Sept last year a friend of mine received a phone call from out of the blue from a guy she had never met. This guy told her that he was very concerned about her mental health and had a “list of her bziarre behaviour.” My friend, Lyn, was in the car with her niece when she took this call on her mobile phone so a witness was present. The guy on the phone wanted to “assess her mental health” and tried to arrange an appointment with Lyn, who by this time just thought it was a bogus call. To cut a long story short, it turns out that this guy had received a call from Lyn’s estranged daughter. He never met with her and didn’t know her but took a phone call. Lyn hadn’t spoken to her in 2 years. Lyn also has no history of any mental health issues. She verified this with her local health authority. There was nothing in her medical records that warranted any such attention from mental health services. From that one phone call the wheels were set in motion on the part of mental health services which culminated in 3 policemen, 2 psychiatrists and a social worker turning up at Lyn’s house at 9.40pm totally unannounced with a COURT ORDER to gain entry! Needless to say Lyn was terrified as the only possible outcome of such a scenario is forced treatment and her possibly being sectioned! [PCR: as it is called in the UK; in the U.S. it's called involuntary commitment] FROM A PHONE CALL FROM HER ESTRANGED DAUGHTER! I found this unbelievable and totally unaceptable that mental health services even THINK they have a right to do such a thing let alone the valid legality of such actions. Luckily for Lyn, the social worker recognised her from her school days and apparently they cannot treat or be involved with anyone they have prior knowledge of (or some such thing) so the action was called off. Lyn was told to be in the next evening and to be ready for their return. It was only through her contact with CCHR [Citizens Commission on Human Rights] that the whole thing was called off. They backed off once CCHR got onto it and I can’t thank them enough and neither could Lyn.
Comment by nitrochic — January 7, 2011 @ 11:29 am |
We are going to get you for libel. Hire a lawyer quick.
Comment by Iam Anidiot — February 23, 2011 @ 10:54 pm |
Well, what can I say? Your on-screen name says it all.
Comment by Psych Crime Reporter — February 24, 2011 @ 10:50 am |
Thanks for doing this. They can’t stand the light of truth
Comment by Andria — April 14, 2011 @ 9:20 pm |
You say you would do this 12 hours a day; you enjoy ruining lives? Let me get your real name and then we can find out about you. I am not in the medical field. Nor do I care one way or the other about your posts. Give everyone your info and let us find the skeletons in your closet. You are in San Antonio, why are you hiding? Most likely you are a pedophile and afraid of your own shadow. So, do you have the bateem to give your true identity? I doubt it. Let us see how you answer this. Most likely with some epithet directed at me which will prove my post true or you will not approve my post at all.
Comment by brad horowitz — June 30, 2011 @ 9:07 pm |
Psych Crime Reporter readers,
Meet Brad Horowitz. Maybe it’s just be but, he seems a bit disgruntled, doesn’t he?
Brad, nothing is posted on this blog that hasn’t been published elsewhere first–like on state health care licensing board websites and online news sites.
So if you really think you have a valid point, take it to the source of the information and spare me your mild (and empty) threats.
Sincerely,
Sue
Comment by Psych Crime Reporter — June 30, 2011 @ 9:15 pm |
Well! Hell hath no fury like a……a…….an idiot scorned LOL!!! You know it takes guts to confront truth. There are tomes of evidence that psychiatry is a bogus junk science peddling dangerous drugs. What about the story of 10 year old Harry Hucknall, on prozac and ritalin, who hung himself with his belt from his bunk bed. (This young boy was related to singer Mick Hucknall of Simply Red.)
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-2002856/Harry-Hucknall-10-killed-taking-Ritalin.html
Is this a made up story? I don’t think so! Are the parents faking their grief? I don’t think so! Will Tomothy, Andrew Smith, Iam Anidiot, Kathy, Lawrence Mark and the lovely Brad be doing ANYTHING about it? Mmmmmm….. let me guess…..I DON’T F*%*&£G THINK SO!
Comment by nitrochic — July 1, 2011 @ 2:10 am
Always great to have your input, nitrochic.
(I wonder what Mick’s feelings are about it…)
Sue
Comment by Psych Crime Reporter — July 1, 2011 @ 10:44 am
Any time! I’ve got your back Sue!
Comment by nitrochic — July 11, 2011 @ 1:48 am |
Hello,
I would like to contact the webmaster of the blog. If you could please email me at the below email I would greatly appreciate it. I appreciate the work you are doing and urgently need to speak to you. This is not a solicitation of any kind and I will respect any privacy issues as well.
Warm regards
Comment by David — July 25, 2011 @ 3:43 pm |
Please e-mail me your inquiry via this blog, thanks.
Comment by Psych Crime Reporter — July 28, 2011 @ 2:01 pm |
Man dies at old vineyards new pstch unit 3 days after it opened. I hear from several people they knew this suicide was coming. uHS will clean this up too.
Comment by old vineyard — September 5, 2011 @ 3:01 pm |
Hello Psych Crime Reporter!
Great site you have here. I just wanted to reply to something Angela said and although it was over a year ago, I still feel like it’s worth mentioning. She said “I suspect this site is financed by the Church of Scientology. It makes too much of an effort to downgrade mental health without balancing facts about treatment.”
I am a Scientologist. Whether this site is run by a Scientologist, I do not know nor do I care but I have to tell you that it’s starting to piss me off that whenever an individual (or group for that matter) sheds any light of truth on the current state of our mental health system(s) or any of the doctors in it, some people scream “Scientology”. This begs the question “why”?
After witnessing this time after time and having mulled it over for a little while, the only logical answer for me is that you Angela (and people like you) must agree with putting 5 year old children on extremely toxic cocktails of antipsychotic drugs – drugs that in previous years were used to keep schizophenic inmates quiet (also prescribed off-label I might add). That it’s okay to drug our elderly willy-nilly in nursing homes. That ect (electroconvulsive therapy) is good for the soul. That lobotomies cure mental illness – although they’ve stopped using the ice pick thank god.
You think Scientologists (and I speak for myself here) are “making too much of an effort to downgrade mental health”? As an individual who happens to be a Scientologist, I actually feel I’m not doing enough to apprise people of the possible dangers associated with the current “treatment” used today – and I do a lot. I am not against mental health treatment Angela, I am outraged at what passes for treatment (re-read 3rd paragraph).
Would love to hear your views about the “balanced facts about treatment”. Have you seen all the Blogs/Websites popping up all over the Net regarding (not my words) ‘psychiatric survival’? Read any personal horror stories regarding the debilitating effects and after effects of SSRI’s (the number one treatment for depression these days) lately? Sat in front of a mother whose children have been taken away and put on psychtropic medication by the “authorities” (Children’s Aid Society)? Gut wrenching Angela. Heard about any parents who’ve lost their children after putting them on these ‘treatments’ recently? Yeah – splain that one to me Angela, maybe there’s something I don’t get eh?
No, not everyone who’s raging against the machine is a Scientologist. Just a decent bunch of people with that rare ability to distinguish.
To Andrew – who’s “we”?
Formerly, when religion was strong and science weak, men mistook magic for medicine; now, when science is strong and religion weak, men mistake medicine for magic. – S. Szasz – Professor Emeritus of Psychiatry at the State University of New York Health Science Center (not a Scientologist)
Comment by Lori Farquhar-Bryenton — September 28, 2011 @ 12:17 pm |
Hi Lori,
If you look elsewhere on the site, I openly declare that I accept the “Scientologist!” accusation as a compliment. Why? Because I see that the Scientologists are out there putting out the truth about psychiatry and other societal ills. I know Scientologists personally, which is something I will bet none of these “accusers” can claim.
But the bottom line is that if these “accusers” really had a valid argument, they would pitch it. They don’t. The best they can do is scream “Scientologist,” which is, as I said, a compliment around here.
There are so many people and groups who are carrying the message about the truth about psychiatry–too many to mention here. Thanks for stopping by and commenting.
Best,
Sue
Comment by Psych Crime Reporter — October 7, 2011 @ 7:58 pm |
I may Have a lawsuit, I was heald against my own will and at work the day before. I have two complaints with the attorney general and no help please respond with a lawyer. email then I’ll call you. sgarden55@gmail.com. sally from Penna
Comment by sally — January 22, 2012 @ 5:33 pm |
I may have a lawsuit, can any one help me find a lawyer. I worked the day before, and was held 12 days. I have 2 claims to the attorney generals, office. Please respond, life has not been the same since.
Comment by sally — January 22, 2012 @ 5:43 pm |
News out of Dover, Delaware: Psychologist Recently Suspended for Sexual Misconduct had landed teaching certificate and teaching job while under investigation:
News Article:
http://www.doverpost.com/topstories/x503114545/Special-Report-Suspended-psychologist-teaching-at-Campus-Community-High-School
Legal Documents:
https://dpronline.delaware.gov/mylicense%20weblookup/PublicDocuments/35-Asay-Janet-Consent-2012.pdf
Comment by Mark — March 14, 2012 @ 10:26 am |
Oh, nice. I missed that one.
Thanks,
Sue
Comment by Psych Crime Reporter — March 15, 2012 @ 8:31 pm |
I feel I am under arrack by the local court system in my divorce.
It is amazing the energy that seems to have been unleashed.
Anyone heard of corruption in the Frederick county courts?
It appears to be attorney and therapist driven.
Comment by e seagraves — March 29, 2012 @ 1:58 pm |
Hoping someone can recommend appropriate action to resolve a psychologist’s biased and fraudulent social study evaluation.
My ex wife has a history of drug addiction, alcoholism and domestic violence. She has abused, neglected, and endangered our young children. Upon learning that she was repeatedly driving the children while high to obtain and distribute prescription medications (and admitted doing so on recorded audio), and after an unsuccessful atempt at intervention, I filed Pro Se for Divorce with restraining order. Then, unfortunately I retained an incompetent attorney.
The Court ordered a Social Study. Her attorney nominated his psychologist friend of 30 years, with no objection from my attorney.
The psychologist violated multiple sections of the Texas Family Code pertaining to a Social Study and failed to comply with APA standards. Despite overwhelming and incontoverible evidence, he concealed her drug addiction and related issues. He made many false and misleading statements of material fact in his report to the Court, and in his sworn Oral Deposition, and in his trial testimony. He knowingly recommended to the Court that primary posession be awarded to an abusive, negligent, endangering, drug addict mother.My attorney was unprepared at Trial, failed to aggressively examine him, and presented none of the damning evidence that I spent hundreds of hours compiling.
Since Trial, my EX has continued to abuse prescription medications and endanger the children. I have had to personally rush her to the ER multiple times. In speaking with several Family Law attorneys, it has become apparent that this psychologist has quite a sleezy reputation for abandoning his duty of objectivity in favor of influential business relationships. Unfortunately, the “best interest of the children” is compromised in favor of “the best interest of the PHD”
What can I do to expose this guy and hold him accountable? I have loads of evidence!
Comment by Mike Waters — April 22, 2012 @ 1:32 pm |
Hi Mike,
I forwarded your message to someone I know who might be able to assist you.
Sue
Comment by Psych Crime Reporter — May 2, 2012 @ 8:15 pm |
Hi, thank you for putting together this blog. I’ve uncovered a network of politically motivated NIH researchers using Public Health networks and DoJ community outreach to profile and target non-conformists with years harassment. Their primary goal is to thwart immigration reform. However they are hiding this by labeling people ‘hostile’ and the subjecting them with years of insidious racial testing that is not intended to determine bias but to bait and provoke a reaction that can be used to discredit and incriminate. Please check out my blog where I posted. It is all but impossible to report these issues to police or the news media. If you know anyone who would be interested in this issue please point me to them.
Comment by keepingsweets — April 30, 2012 @ 9:54 pm |
Hi,
What is the name/URL of your blog?
Sue
Comment by Psych Crime Reporter — May 2, 2012 @ 8:02 pm |
Hello,
Here you go:
http://keepingsweetinseattle.wordpress.com
Comment by keepingsweets — May 2, 2012 @ 8:21 pm
This website is obviously controlled and managed by either someone from the Church of Scientology or someone who sympathizes with their perspective. CCHR is a front for the Church of Scientology.
It is true there are some mental health professionals who are not ethical.
It is also true that there are many people who are helped by psychologists and psychiatry.
This site publishes information out of context just to promote the CoS point of view.
The fact is, Hubbard stole the ideas of Alfred Korzybski and that many of the ideas in the Dianetics books are just inaccurate descriptions of how the mind and emotions work.
I know for a fact that the CosS engages in violence and harassment campaigns to quiet its detractors.
Comment by Alfred DeWolf — May 2, 2012 @ 8:44 pm |
Yes, obviously Psych Crime Reporter is controlled and managed by Scientology or a Scientologist.
Obviously!
Because everyone knows that only Scientologists are against the harm that psychiatry and the mental health establishment can and do inflict upon patients. And I guess every single person who has posted a comment in support of a story on this blog is a Scientologist, too.
What is truly obvious is that you don’t have a really valid argument. As if your shouting and pointing “Scientologist” would somehow render the stories on this blog (and many, many others elsewhere) somehow untrue or invalid.
I really hate to stoop to name calling, but you are a pathetic dumbass with an IQ in the double digits.
Sue
Comment by Psych Crime Reporter — May 2, 2012 @ 9:02 pm |